User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
ctorrent
|
|
02-08-2009, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
OK. Understand.
If I need to stop ctorrent client I must kill ctorrent processes and dctcs process? (02-08-2009 01:40 PM)snarfle Wrote: I'm not sure I understand this question completely. I'll try to answer it anyway. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
Quote:If I need to stop ctorrent client I must kill ctorrent processes and dctcs process? Huh? Again, I'm not quite sure what you mean. To stop an individual ctorrentclient (= 1 torrent download), connect to the web interface, select the torrent and click 'Stop'. One of the ctorrent processes will then exit. To force a reload of dctcs.conf, kill the dctcs process only (e.g. kill `pidof dctcs`) and then restart it. Your torrents (that is, ctorrent processes) will keep running in the background no problem. There is now a web interface available to modify the configuration file and restart the dctcs automatically. See the web page for details. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 05:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2009 06:05 PM by papka__.)
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
Ok. Thanks.
![]() Just have situation - NMT hangs on. Switch it off/on. Install new version. Ctorrent started ok and .... start to recheck all torrents (already rechecked and previously seeded too). (02-08-2009 04:58 PM)snarfle Wrote: Huh? Again, I'm not quite sure what you mean. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
So, if I understand correctly, if NMT hangs and have to be rebooted (and this happens, unfortunately, very often), all incomplete files will be verified (like in Transmission)? If so, is cTorrent verifies them faster than Transmission? Thanks!
|
|||
|
02-08-2009, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
I will try.
Thank you |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
Quote:So, if I understand correctly, if NMT hangs and have to be rebooted (and this happens, unfortunately, very often), all incomplete files will be verified (like in Transmission)? If so, is cTorrent verifies them faster than Transmission? Thanks! Both complete and incomplete files will be fully hash checked. I'm not sure about the performance of ctorrent vs. Transmission in this. As I understand it cTorrent should be quicker, but I'm not sure. I do know that cTorrent seeds while hash checking. I think it also already starts downloading while still checking but I'm not sure. I'm having some unrelated issues with my NMT which prevent me from checking this properly. I have however noticed (but this could just be me) that I don't have to reboot my NMT as often since I stopped using Transmission a while ago. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 06:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2009 06:57 PM by papka__.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
(02-08-2009 05:54 PM)snarfle Wrote: Both complete and incomplete files will be fully hash checked. I'm not sure about the performance of ctorrent vs. Transmission in this. As I understand it cTorrent should be quicker, but I'm not sure. I do know that cTorrent seeds while hash checking. I think it also already starts downloading while still checking but I'm not sure. Seems the situation with rehashing completed torrents is not good. If I have 10 completed torrents with size ~10GB each anyway process will be very long. ![]() I will use Ctorrent for downloading but Transmission for seeding. Good application .... but rehashing....
|
|||
|
02-08-2009, 07:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2009 07:58 PM by dany88.)
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
mmm.....we may modify the sourcecode in order to rehash only downloading files, and maybe to rehash in a more convenient way for NMT (i have some ideas, but i must look some details)......
I will try the next week to see the sourcecode edit: -f Force saved bitfield or seed mode (skip hash check at startup) Perform a fast startup by skipping the initial (or background) hash verification of the files. This option is not generally recommended since the client now performs initial hash checking in the background. Use this option only if CTorrent was shut down cleanly when last downloading this torrent and you are absolutely certain that the bitfield (if download is not complete) and data files are intact and correct. To emulate the old behavior of hash-checking all pieces before beginning download or seeding, use -f along with the -c option. mmm....we can use -f, but i don't know if it is a good idea...the file could be corrupt.... |
|||
1 user says Thank You to dany88 for this post |
|
02-08-2009, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
Quote:mmm....we can use -f, but i don't know if it is a good idea...the file could be corrupt.... It's not a good idea. Like you say, the file may be corrupt. Especially in the case of NMT, situations where your torrent clients exit are usually crashes or unclean shutdowns. After a crash/unclean shutdown a hash check should always be done to guarantee the integrity of the data files. Instead of changing the options, I would recommend going after the source of the problem (which is that the NMT crashes frequently). It would be better to collect as much information on the crashes as you can and report them to Syabas so they can maybe fix the actual problem. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 10:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2009 10:40 PM by papka__.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
(02-08-2009 08:59 PM)snarfle Wrote: It's not a good idea. Like you say, the file may be corrupt. Especially in the case For incomplete torrents hash checking is needed, but for completed? Files already checked and saved. To wait for correction of all bugs in NMT (IMHO it's not possible) is equal to wait for Transmission without bugs/hangs. Why we need Ctorrent? It's light, stable, quick NOW. But we can't normally use it because NMT sometime crash due to self bugs. As I tell for ex if NMT crashes 1 time in a week - I need 2 days for recheck due to HD content size. Due to recheck it's not possible to use NMT normally. We need useful Ctorrent now - not after all bugs will be fixed. |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 11:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
Quote:For incomplete torrents hash checking is needed, but for completed? Files already checked and saved. The fact that the files were checked and saved at one point does not mean they will stay that way. While admittedly it is unlikely that data corruption will occur, silent corruption after a crash is not unheard of. Therefore the default behavior can be considered a normal precaution. I don't understand why it's "not possible to use NMT normally". I restarted my NMT earlier this evening with about 10GB worth of torrents downloaded and they were done checking after I finished watching a movie (on the NMT) while it was busy. The other problem with disabling hash-checks is that there is currently no way of doing it automatically. YODCTCS is "dumb" in the sense that it just hands over control to the ctorrent process. The ctorrent process won't know if a file is for seeding or for downloading unless it does its hash-check, or you tell it manually by adding a '-f' flag. Because YODCTCS can't decide what to use a -f flag on, it's not currently possible to do it automatically. The author of YODCTCS is also aware of this issue. See this thread on the OpenWRT forum for a discussion about the topic (dske is the author): http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=13263&p=2 I don't believe this is something which can be "fixed" (though again, I don't believe it's broken) without modifying YODCTCS, which is not something I have the time or the will for these days. All that being said, as a work-around for you, what you could do is move or copy all the .torrent files for torrents you completed to a separate directory (possibly by using the -X option to ctorrent) and use a script like so (off the top of my head, not sure if it'll run): Code: #!/bin/sh |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 11:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
And this will be the best solution for completed torrents ,with we want to seed.
In this code you for sure forgot about -d switch ,witch sets cTorrent as daemon process (backgrounding it) |
|||
|
02-08-2009, 11:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: ctorrent
(02-08-2009 11:20 PM)snarfle Wrote: The fact that the files were checked and saved at one point does not mean Hmm.... It's not so bad solution. Thanks. Will try tomorrow. |
|||
|
02-09-2009, 09:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
Yeah! Your workaround is cool. With some modifications it's working for me very good.
Thanks a lot.
|
|||
|
02-09-2009, 02:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: ctorrent
Hi guys,
Why don't you try rtorrent? It's really great! and the web ui (rtgui) is fantastic. what abouy it? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| CTorrent webgui | Daskie | 0 | 397 |
01-21-2013 10:16 PM Last Post: Daskie |
|
| Problem with enhanced cTorrent: no web admin | cosmos | 2 | 1,330 |
03-07-2012 08:09 PM Last Post: aguilui |
|
| Which is faster? Transmission or cTorrent? | stryker74 | 1 | 1,688 |
07-28-2011 07:59 AM Last Post: Darksir |
|
| ctorrent stalled | chimpybits | 1 | 1,845 |
05-30-2010 09:55 AM Last Post: chimpybits |
|
| Dissapointed with Transmission (and cTorrent) | ds99jove | 1 | 2,905 |
12-01-2009 05:15 AM Last Post: gtdaqua |
|
| cTorrent webui crashing | deGauss | 18 | 6,576 |
11-02-2009 09:44 AM Last Post: papka__ |
|
| Torrent Clients Compared: cTorrent, BTPD, Transmission | vlieter | 18 | 18,048 |
10-20-2009 08:58 AM Last Post: pierrot2k |
|
| Ctorrent & trackers | aroymak | 4 | 2,616 |
10-12-2009 06:23 PM Last Post: Asmo83 |
|
| cTorrent Transmision problem: add tracker & resume | jimbim | 3 | 4,768 |
04-06-2009 11:18 AM Last Post: gtdaqua |
|
| Transmission vs Ctorrent | Darksir | 0 | 3,708 |
02-18-2009 09:04 AM Last Post: Darksir |
|

Twitter
Facebook
NMT Wiki
Search
Member List
Help
A-400 [13 May 2013]


.png)




![[+]](images/collapse_collapsed.gif)

To stop an individual ctorrent




